Fact Checking Policy

At Search Engine Realm, we are dedicated to delivering accurate, trustworthy, and transparent content. This Fact Checking Policy outlines our commitment to verifying factual information, stating our sources, handling corrections, and protecting our editorial integrity. We recognize that high-quality fact-checking builds reader trust—a foundation of our platform.

1. Purpose and Scope

The purpose of this Fact Checking Policy is to:

• Ensure that published content demonstrates accuracy, transparency, and impartiality

• Define the processes used for verifying information

• Set guidelines for addressing errors and corrections

• Offer readers clarity on our verification standards and editorial practices

This policy applies to all articles on Search Engine Realm, including news, trend analysis, reviews, and other informational posts.

2. Core Principles

a. Accuracy & Reliability

We are committed to factual precision. All claims presented as facts must be verifiable through credible, reliable sources such as official statements, peer-reviewed research, reputable news organizations, and authoritative data repositories.

b. Impartiality & Non-Partisanship

We apply the same rigorous standards to all claims, regardless of the subject, origin, or political context—ensuring neutrality and fairness in every analysis. Our fact-checking does not support or oppose any ideology, policy, candidate, or political office.

c. Transparency

We disclose our methods, sources, and any conflicts of interest. When sources request anonymity for safety or confidentiality reasons, we clearly explain why while providing as much context as possible. Our Fact Checking Policy holds itself to the same transparency as our content.

3. Verification Process

1. Selection of Claims

   • We assess content either proactively (monitoring trending claims) or through reader submissions. We prioritize topics with high public impact, urgency, or novelty, applying the same selection criteria consistently.

2. Source Evaluation

   • Primary sources (e.g., official reports, statements, datasets) are prioritized. Secondary sources are accepted only if corroborated by multiple reputable outlets. At least two independent sources are referenced for each claim assessed.

3. Expert Consultation

   • For technical or specialized topics, we consult qualified professionals. Any expert opinions are cited fully, including their credentials, affiliation, and potential biases.

4. Transparent Methodology

   • Each article should clearly describe how the claim was checked—for example, pasting direct quotes from databases, using reverse image search tools, or reviewing legislation.

5. Clear Verdict Labels

   • We classify our checks using clear, standardized terms such as True, False, Misleading, Missing Context, or Satire, following AFP and IFCN conventions. Definitions are provided for transparency.

4. Correction and Updates

Mistakes may occur despite rigorous checks. When identified:

• The article is updated promptly with corrected information.

• A visible correction notice is added, detailing what was changed and when.

• Major factual revisions prompt an editorial note summarizing the update.

• A publicly accessible correction log is maintained for accountability.

5. Reader Feedback and Engagement

We encourage readers to participate in maintaining content accuracy:

• Readers may submit fact-check requests or corrections via our contact form ([email protected]).

• All feedback is reviewed critically and promptly.

• Readers are acknowledged when their input results in a correction.

6. Organizational Independence

Our editorial integrity is paramount:

• Fact-checkers operate independently from advertisers and sponsors.

• We disclose funding sources or partnerships that may influence editorial content.

• There is no influence from political, commercial, or ideological entities in choosing or evaluating claims.

7. Ethical Standards and Training

• Our Fact Checking Policy draws from global best practices, such as those by the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) and the European Fact-Checking Standards Network (EFCSN).

• Team members receive ongoing training on verification methodologies, ethical journalism, and bias detection.

• We adhere to recognized journalism codes, promoting harm limitation, fairness, and responsible sourcing.

8. Use of Technology

• We use fact-checking tools, including reverse image search, AI-assisted plagiarism detection, and archived link services to preserve evidence.

• When AI tools are involved, we ensure human editorial oversight and verification remain central.

• Technical methods are documented and disclosed where appropriate.

9. Transparency of Sources and Funding

• All sources are clearly cited, with direct links whenever available.

• If an organization funds or sponsors specific coverage, that relationship is transparently disclosed.

• We uphold transparency in listing editorial staff, methodology, conflict of interest policies, and organizational affiliations.

10. Periodic Review of the Policy

This Fact Checking Policy is a living document:

• We review and update it regularly to reflect evolving best practices and technology changes.

• Policy revisions will be clearly indicated with updated effective dates.

11. Summary Table: Fact Checking Policy in Action

12. Contact and Accountability

For questions or feedback regarding our Fact Checking Policy or specific article corrections, contact us:

Email: [email protected]
Website: https://searchenginerealm.com/

Your trust is essential—this Fact Checking Policy reflects our commitment to journalistic integrity, accuracy, and transparency.